Petitioner challenged a bank citation and sought writ relief to quash the citation and grant installment. Cash credit account was NPA with DRT proceedings pending. Court held no interference required due to DRT pendency and dismissed petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:112578
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19478 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ajit Gahlaut Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Shekhar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Brahmanand Singh,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the citation dated 20.3.2024 issued by the respondent no.2 to this writ petition.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to adopt coercive measures against the petitioner in pursuance of the citation dated 23.3.2024 and fix some easy installment so that petitioner can deposit the same."
Order Date :- 15.7.2024 Vandana Y.
Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in writ proceedings regarding a citation issuing demand and potential coercive measures where a debt recovery proceeding is pending before the DRT.
Ajit Gahlaut
State Of Up
Chandra Kumar Rai
Vandana Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
