The petitioner failed to appear despite previous adjournments where she was also absent. The court inferred that the petitioner was no longer interested in pursuing the writ petition and dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:146162-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18357 of 2024
Petitioner :- Kishnawati Devi Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 9.9.2024 n.u.
(Manjive Shukla, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Digitally signed by :- NASEEM UDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kishnawati Devi
State Of Up And 4 Others
Shekhar B. Saraf
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
