A writ petition filed by Rajesh Kumar seeking a mandatory direction under Article 226 for the respondent to decide his dated 4.2.2023 representation regarding a Gram Pradhan was dismissed by the High Court, as there was no scope of interference.
The petition was dismissed without any direction being issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:109973
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16788 of 2024
Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Mohan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
"issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 4.2.2023 (Annexure No.2 to the writ petition), within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court."
Order Date :- 8.7.2024 Rameez
Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction under Article 226 to interfere in the decision regarding the representation filed by the petitioner.
Whether the writ petition for mandamus directing the respondent to decide the representation within a stipulated time can be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Kumar
State Of Up
2 Others
Chandra Kumar Rai
Rameez Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
