A married couple sought writ protection against alleged threats from private respondent no.4. State counsel reported Section 126/135 BNS proceedings conducted and a Gram Pradhan certificate confirming the couple live happily; petitioners did not dispute this.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:149641
Court No. - 80
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16613 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt. Mohini And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Singh,Santosh Prajapati Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 12.9.2024 Prajapati
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police protection should be provided to a couple who married against parental wishes amid alleged threats to life and property.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Mohini
Another petitioner
State of U.P.
Respondent no.4 (private individual)
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
