Petitioner's counsel stated that the relief claimed in the writ petition had been granted by the Authority. Respondents admitted this. The Court disposed of the petition as it had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:130003-DB
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15190 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ashish Agarwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh,Tejas Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vineet Sankalp
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the relief claimed in the writ petition has been granted by the Authority itself. Therefore, the cause of action does not survive.
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 12.8.2024 Jaideep/-
Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashish Agarwal
State Of U.P.
Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Manish Kumar Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
