A two-line writ petition order; the petitioner's counsel stated that the complaint filed by the petitioner had been decided by the concerned authority, and the court accordingly dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. Nothing of general application is decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:121022-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12846 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt Kailashpati Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P. Singh,Ashraf Ali Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Tiwari,C.S.C.,Sai Girdhar
Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 29.7.2024 Kuldeep
(Manjive Shukla, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Kailashpati
State Of Up And 3 Others
Shekhar B. Saraf
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
