Petitioner approached this Court challenging an order allowing the respondent to restore a fair price shop. Learned counsel informed the Court that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the present case. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:16794
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1003554 of 2010
Petitioner :- Mohd.Ashfaq Respondent :- Commissioner Devi Patan Division Gonda And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- A.R.Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
received instructions from the petitioner and on the basis of instructions has submitted that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the present case.
(Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 23.2.2024
Ravi/
Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable after the petitioner expresses lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Mohd. Ashfaq
Commissioner, Devi Patan Division, Gonda
Respondent No. 2
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
