R.T.Chaubey v. D.D.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed in default as neither the petitioner's counsel was present nor was any adjournment requested.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:36630
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 9990 of 1988
Petitioner :- R.T.Chaubey Respondent :- D.D.C. Counsel for Petitioner :- Farid Ahmad,D.C.Mukherjee,Pradeep Shukla,Ravi Kishore Joshi,S.S.Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Girija Shankar Tripathi,Pradeep Kumar Shukla,Radhey Shyam Tiwary,Rakesh Pathak,Suresh Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case has been called.
Neither the learned counsel for the petitioner is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
Writ petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 13.5.2024 S. Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.T.Chaubey
- respondent
D.D.C.
Coram
Manish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/9990/1988
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Savitri Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others
Kamarool Nisha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Nayab Tehsildar (Diyara) Tehsil Jaisinghpur Distt. Sultanpur and 2 Others
Chhotelal @ Chhotan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
Saisun Nisa Vs the Collector / D.M. Sultanpur and Others