In a writ petition concerning land or local bodies, the court dismissed the petition because the petitioner's counsel indicated lack of instruction.
None; writ petition dismissed for lack of instruction from counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:80059
Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 708 of 1993 Petitioner :- Gaon Sabha Sayampur Respondent :- D.D.C.And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.S.Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,J.P.Singh
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Sri Ankit Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri R.S. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner states he has no instruction in the matter.
Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instruction.
In case, cause of action survives in the writ petition and client of learned counsel for the petitioner responds, he may file recall application within a period of two months to recall the said order.
Order Date :- 3.12.2024 Sattyarth
Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Gaon Sabha Sayampur
D.D.C.
Others
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
