Subeer Mohammad v. D.D.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the petitioner was absent. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:79594
Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 417 of 1993 Petitioner :- Subeer Mohammad Respondent :- D.D.C. Counsel for Petitioner :- B.R.Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 2.12.2024 NS
Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subeer Mohammad
- respondent
D.D.C.
Coram
Saral Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/417/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court