Sahaj Ram v. Deputy Director of Consolidation Bahraich and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear to press the writ petition. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Petitioner failed to appear to press the writ petition. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:4841
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 489 of 2002
Petitioner :- Sahaj Ram Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation Bahraich And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.K. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Afzal Hasan
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.1.2024 Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sahaj Ram
Deputy Director Of Consolidation Bahraich
2 Others
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court