Disposed

Ram Bhajan Chaurasiya v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and Others

Allahabad HC16 Jan 2024/139/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner sought expeditious decision of a revenue revision pending since January 2022 against a stay order. The court disposed of the petition, directing the Additional Commissioner to decide the revision preferably within six months without adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to decide the revision expeditiously, preferably within six months, without adjournment.

Ram Bhajan Chaurasiya Vs Addl. Commissioner… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:4059

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 139 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Bhajan Chaurasiya Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶5

Heard.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with.

¶7

The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-

¶8

"(i). Issue an order or direction to thereby directing the Opposite Party No.- 1/Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, to decide the Revision No-61/2022 (Computerized Case No.- C202204000000061) "Ram Kumar and others Vs. Ram Bhajan Chaurasiya" filed by the opposite party no-2 to 5 against the stay order dated 22-11-2021 passed in favour of petitioner, expeditiously and within a reasonable/stipulated period of time as directed by this Hon'ble Court."

¶9

It is stated that as per para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual , an appeal or revision should preferably be decided within a period of six months. However, in the instant case, the revision is pending since January 2022 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, is suffering great hardship and mental agony. In these circumstances, indulgence of this Court is required in the matter. The prayer is to expedite the proceedings of pending case.

¶10

Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Revision No-61/2022, Computerized Case No.- C202204000000061 (Ram Kumar and others Vs. Ram Bhajan Chaurasiya), most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶13

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 16.1.2024

¶15

Jyoti/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ram Bhajan Chaurasiya v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bhajan Chaurasiya v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Jiawan and Others Vs Ganga Das and Others

Dilwant Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. and Others

Chandra Prakash Vs Chief Revenue Officer District Gonda and 26 Others

Sushil Kumar and Others Vs Additional Commissioner Judicial- I, Lucknow and Others

Nadeem Azhar and 5 Others Vs Consolidation Officer Tehsil Hasanganj Unnao and 3 Others

Sumitra Devi Vs Tehsildar (Judicial ), Tehsil Kunda, Pratapgarh and Others