Jagan Nath v. D.D.C and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel to press the matter. An existing interim order, if any, was vacated.
What did the court decide?
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:79590
Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 429 of 1993 Petitioner :- Jagan Nath Respondent :- D.D.C And Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- U.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 2.12.2024 NS
Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jagan Nath
- respondent
D.D.C And Ors
Coram
NITIN KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/429/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court