Writ petition challenging dismissal of objections under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act regarding an adverse-possession entry on Plot No.34 in Barabanki/Ayodhya; appeal and revision dismissed without adjudicating the issue. Court orders counter affidavit, status quo till 26.02.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 40 of 2024
Petitioner :- Siya Ram And Others
Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Barabanki And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Tiwari,M.K. Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Taufeeq Ahmad
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
that initial order dated 13.04.2000 was not ex parte but was a by party order. The revision of the petitioners has also been dismissed for the said reasons.
Order Date :- 16.1.2024 KR/ank
Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether adverse-possession based recording of respondent no.4's name on Plot No.34 should be adjudicated on merits by the consolidation authorities.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Siya Ram And Others
Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Barabanki
private respondent no.4/Caveator
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
