Petitioner sought consideration of an interim relief application filed with his consolidation revision. The court directed the revisional authority to consider and decide it after hearing, preferably within six weeks of a preponement application, without examining merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:14029
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 140 of 2024
Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation Distt. Ambedkar Nagar And 9 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Srivastava,Yogesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Order Date :- 16.2.2024 KR
Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Should the revisional authority be directed to decide the petitioner's application for interim relief pending in the consolidation revision?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Kumar
Deputy Director Of Consolidation Distt. Ambedkar Nagar
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
