Writ petition regarding unpaid salary since 1996 was dismissed for want of prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on three consecutive dates of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:164374
Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9606 of 2024
Petitioner :- Mohd Sikandar Khan Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Pandey,Mohd Naushad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
"1. Case called out. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
2. Sri Shailendra Singh, the learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner claims to have been appointed in the year 1996 and that he has not been paid any salary since then. He has submitted that the writ petition has been filed after an unexplained delay which renders it liable to be dismissed.
3. As the learned counsel for the petitioner is not present, in the interest of justice the hearing is adjourned.
4. List this case on 30.07.2024 as fresh.
5. In case the learned counsel for the petitioner will not appear even on the adjourned date, the Court will pass appropriate order after taking into consideration the submission of the learned Standing Counsel."
2. Nobody is present to press this writ petition.
3. List this case in the week commencing 27.08.2024, as fresh."
Order Date :- 16.10.2024 S.K.
Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd Sikandar Khan
State Of Up
Prakash Padia
Sweety Kanodia
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
