Petitioner sought direction to continue contractual service as PRT against Army Welfare Education Society. Court held petition not maintainable per Supreme Court law and dismissed at admission stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:126335
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9291 of 2024
Petitioner :- Kumari Ritu Bala Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manjur Mohammad Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Rajesh Tripathi
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
after termination thereof due to efflux of contract period, is not maintainable and it is dismissed as such at the admission stage itself.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.]
Order Date :- 6.8.2024 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed for continuance of contractual service against an Army Welfare Education Society is maintainable in light of Supreme Court law.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Army Welfare Education Society v. Sunil Kumar SharmaApplied¶3
Army Welfare Education Society v. Sunil Kumar Sharma, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1683 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kumari Ritu Bala
Union Of India
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
