The petitioner challenged BTC training matters initiated in 2015, filed in 2024. The respondent contended the petition was barred by delay. The petitioner's counsel stated she did not wish to press the petition. The Court dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:167824
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9099 of 2024
Petitioner :- Deepika Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Awasthi,Raj Kiran Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Shri Sudhanshu Shekhar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the controversy pertains to the BTC training which was initiated in the year 2015. The petitioner has approached this Court in the year 2024. The petition is barred by delay and laches.
Faced with this, Shri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 22.10.2024 Dhananjai
Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition was barred by delay and laches?
Deepika
State of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
Dhananjai
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
