Disposed

Tej Pratap Singh and Another v. State of U.P. Thur. Prin. Secy Dairy Development Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC25 Sept 2024WRIA/8504/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking leave encasement and interest for two petitioners who had superannuated. Without adjudicating the merits or facts, the court granted liberty to file a representation before the Managing Director of the Dairy Federation for consideration.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file fresh representation with the Managing Director for consideration of leave encasement and interest within specified timelines.

Tej Pratap Singh and Another vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:66466

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8504 of 2024 Petitioner :- Tej Pratap Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thur. Prin. Secy Dairy Development Lko. And 3 Others

¶4

Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Srivastava,Akshat Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Patel,Shanker Lal

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned counsel for opposite party no.1, Ms. Shruti Sahu, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 2 & 3 and Mr. Pankaj Patel, learned counsel for opposite party no.4.

¶7

Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of leave encasement due to petitioners alongwith interest in view of the fact that petitioner no.1 superannuated in the year 2019 and petitioner no.2 superannuated in the year 2020.

¶8

Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioners, without entering into the merits of the case and particularly since adjudication of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representation before opposite party No.3 i.e. Managing Director, Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited, Lucknow which shall be considered and decided in the light of judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ata Husain Rizvi versus State of U.P. & Ors. Writ A No.7243 of 2023 in case the same is applicable within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

¶9

In case petitioners are found entitled for the said relief, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter. The concerned authority shall also consider the aspect of payment of interest on delay within the same time period.

¶10

With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of .

¶11

Order Date :- 25.9.2024 Subodh/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Tej Pratap Singh and Another v. State of U.P. Thur. Prin. Secy Dairy Development Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tej Pratap Singh and Another v. State of U.P. Thur. Prin. Secy Dairy Development Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Om Prakash Prasad Vs Cane Commissioner U.P. Lko. and Another

Poonam Chaurasiya Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 5 Others

Smt. Bharti Rathour Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. Lko and 3 Others

Mukesh Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Bhishmpal and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Shiv Narayan Gupta vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Communication Govt. of India New Delhi and 2 Others