Writ petition from 2002 dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel for the petitioner appeared or sought adjournment when the list was revised. Interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:23371
Court No. - 23
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6941 of 2002
Petitioner :- Smt.Suman Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through The Secy.Agriculure And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Tarun K. Misra,A.R. Masoodi,Mukesh Kumar Singh,Rajendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
1. List has been revised.
2. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, although the names of four counsel have been shown in the cause list, and no request for adjournment has also been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Sri Rajeev Srivastava, learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The matter is quite old and it pertains to the year 2002.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.)
Order Date :- 18.3.2024 cks/-
Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Suman Singh
State of U.P. through the Secretary Agriculture
Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
