Ajay Kumar Pathak vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Secondary Education, Lko. and Others

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:69855

Court No. - 5

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6806 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Secondary Education, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents .

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection.

¶7

In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation.

¶8

With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.

¶9

It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.

¶10

Order Date :- 17.10.2024 Pachhere/-

¶11

Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ajay Kumar Pathak v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Secondary Education, Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar Pathak v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Secondary Education, Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Manjula Singh and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others

Dinesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Ram Karan Singh @ Sonu Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Rama Kant Tiwari vs U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. Thru. the Managing Director Lko. and 2 Others

Rana Pratap vs U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Thru. Chairman Lko. and 4 Others

Ramsingar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. and Others