The State of UP challenged the petitioner's job transfer, arguing it was a necessary exigency of service since no statutory violation was established. The petition, raising no other points, was dismissed.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:56497
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6561 of 2024
Petitioner :- Arvind Singh Gautam
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Energy Lko And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashank Shukla,Prachi Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neerav Chitravanshi
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Shri Shashank Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Applicant is in a transferable job.
Transfer is an exigency of service. Transfer can be challenged on limited grounds or infraction of statutes. Neither has been established in this case.
No other point has been argued.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 20.8.2024 Vandit
Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer of a petitioner in a transferable job was legal.
Arvind Singh Gautam
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Energy Lko And 2 Others
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
