Disposed

Rukmani Devi v. Yadunandan and 3 Others

Allahabad HC20 Aug 2024A227/3857/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 227, the High Court directed the Civil Court to decide the pending suit within one year, imposed costs for unnecessary adjournments, and mandated strict compliance to ensure timely disposal for an indigent petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Directed the trial court to decide the suit within one year and impose costs for unnecessary adjournments.

Rukmani Devi vs Yadunandan and 3 Others — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:56506

¶2

Court No. - 20

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3857 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Rukmani Devi Respondent :- Yadunandan And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Girish Chandra Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

¶6

The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is to decide the proceedings of the Civil Suit No.1125 of 2022 (Rukmani Devi v. Yadunandan and others) pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Lakhimpur, Kheri within a stipulated period of time.

¶7

Shri Girish Chandra Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the applicant is a handicapped lady who is suffering from 50% permanent disability. It is also claimed that she is 74 years old and is illiterate. She does not have any source of income and is on the verge of starvation.

¶8

In the wake of these facts, the following directions are issued to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Lakhimpur, Kheri before whom the Civil Suit No.1125 of 2022 (Rukmani Devi v. Yadunandan and others), is pending:

¶9

(I) The learned trial court/learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Lakhimpur, Kheri is directed to decide the Civil Suit No.1125 of 2022 (Rukmani Devi v.

¶10

Yadunandan and others), preferably, within a period of one year from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶11

(II) All parties are directed to cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶12

(III) The learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Lakhimpur, Kheri shall not grant any unnecessary adjournment to the parties.

¶13

(IV) In case any party adopts dilatory tactics or creates impediment in compliance of this order, the learned trial court/learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Lakhimpur, Kheri shall impose costs not below Rs.5,000/- for each adjournment against such party. Thereafter, the learned trial court shall record a finding to this effect and proceed in accordance with law.

¶14

(V) In case the counsel for any party does not appear before the learned trial court/learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Lakhimpur, Kheri on any date on the ground of strike of advocates, the trial court shall not permit such counsel (of either party) to appear in this case on future dates.

¶15

(VI) The learned trial court/learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Lakhimpur, Kheri shall proceed with the trial on a day to day basis, if required, to ensure that the above stipulated time period of one year to decide the suit is adhered to.

¶16

With the aforesaid directions, the petition is finally disposed of.

¶17

Order Date :- 20.8.2024 Ashish Tripathi

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rukmani Devi v. Yadunandan and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rukmani Devi v. Yadunandan and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Raju and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Hardesh vs State of Up and Another

Tirath Nishad@ Tirath Lal vs State of U.P. ANOther

Shri Kamal Singh vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Communication, Govt. of India, New Delhi and 2 Others

Shri Ravi Chandra vs Civil Judge Avar Khand Judicial Room No. 29 District Sultanpur and 7 Others

Arvind Singh Gautam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Energy Lko and 2 Others