Disposed
Atish Prasad Mishra v. State Bank of India through Its General Manager, Mumbai and Others
Allahabad HCWRIA/6401/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:55527
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6401 of 2024
Petitioner :- Atish Prasad Mishra Respondent :- State Bank Of India Through Its General Manager, Mumbai And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prateek Tewari,Raj Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Ankit Srivastava
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
"i. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ or order or direction commanding the respondents to pay an amount of Rs. 7,66,902.80/- (Rupees Seven Lacs Sixty Six Thousand Nine Hundred and Two and Eighty Paise Only) to the petitioner towards the acting/ officiating allowance (special allowance), consequential rise in HRA and four year bloc LFC which has been less paid to him."
Order Date :- 12.8.2024 Mohd. Sharif
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to additional acting/officiating allowance, HRA rise and LFC.
Whether the petition should be disposed of by allowing liberty to file fresh representation.
Atish Prasad Mishra
State Bank Of India
Manish Mathur
Mohd. Sharif
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court