Smt Madhumita Pandey v. Union of India and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Chief Justice's Court listed the writ petition for fresh hearing on 20th August, 2024, after respondents relied on a notification dated 21.11.2006 regarding equivalent qualifications, which was not produced in the records.
What the court decided
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5246 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt Madhumita Pandey Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Brij Bhushan Prasad Shrivastava,Saumitra Singh,Vinay Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Arun Bhansali,Chief Justice Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
- Despite grant of sufficient time, the Notification dated 21.11.2006, Annexure-6 (Page 111) published in Gazette has not been produced. However, a copy of the said notification as annexed with the petition has been again produced by learned A.S.G.I.
- In view of the fact that the respondents themselves have relied on the said notification dated 21.11.2006, now the plea being raised on behalf of the respondents is that the advertisement did not indicate the equivalent qualification and in terms of the notification also, the same is only an equivalent qualification.
- Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Rules provide equivalent qualification and prays for time to produce the same.
- In view of the submissions made, list on 20th August, 2024 , as fresh.
Order Date :- 1.8.2024 nd/piyush
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Madhumita Pandey
- respondent
Union Of India
Coram
Arun Bhansali
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/5246/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court