Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent despite the case being called in a 'no adjournment' list.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:29431
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 465 of 2011
Petitioner :- Kandhai Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secy. Secondary Education Govt. Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D.K. Dikshit,Km. Arti Dikshit
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Case is listed under 'the cases shall not be adjourned' category.
Case called out. None is present for the petitioner to press this petition.
In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Consigned to record.
Order Date :- 10.4.2024 Anurag, PS Gr-I
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Kandhai Lal
State Of U.P.Through Secy. Secondary Education Govt. Of U.P.
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
