Disposed

Narendra Deo v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Dairy Development U.P. Lko. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC22 May 2024WRIA/3768/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought orders for promotional pay scales after 19 and 24 years of service. Court granted liberty to file a fresh representation to the Managing Director, Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited, and mandated decision steps.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file fresh representation; decision within eight weeks; implementation within six weeks if entitled.

Narendra Deo vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:45109

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3768 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Narendra Deo

¶5

Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Dairy Development U.P. Lko. And 4 Others

¶6

Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Patel,Shanker Lal,Shruti Sahu

¶7

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party No.1 and Ms. Shruti Sahu learned counsel for opposite parties 2 to 4 and Mr. Pankaj Patel learned counsel for opposite party No.5.

¶9

Petition has been filed with following reliefs:-

¶10

"1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 3 to give benefit of selection grade of one special increment on completion of 19 years of continuous satisfactory services and benefit of second promotional pay scale on completion of 24 years of continuous satisfactory services i.e. with effect from 18.07.2009 in compliance of the order dated 28.01.2009 read with the order dated 31.01.2009 and 24.10.2019 passed by the Opposite party No. 3 ignoring the alleged entry for the year 2002-03 along with all consequential benefit of services.

¶11

2) issue such other suitable writ, order or directions which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶12

3) To allow the petition with cost."

¶13

For the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has already submitted a representation to the authorities concerned dated 18th October, 2004 but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the authorities concerned. At present learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer for a final decision on petitioner's representation.

¶14

Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Managing Director, Pradeshik

¶15

Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual implementation of same shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter.

¶16

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶17

Order Date :- 3.7.2024 prabhat

¶18

Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Narendra Deo v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Dairy Development U.P. Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narendra Deo v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Dairy Development U.P. Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jaikar Pandey and 2 Others Vs Mustaqeem Ahmad and 3 Others

Smt. Sonbarsa Prajapati Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, Govt. of U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

C/M Waqf No 74 to 94 Thru President Haji Mohd. Aslam Qureshi and Anr. vs U.P. Waqf Tribunal, Lucknow and Ors.

Smt. Mamta Yadav vs Prin.Judge Family Court Lucknow and Anr.

Prem Das vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and Others

Hema Pandey vs Additional Principal Judge Court No.8 Family Court, Lucknow and Anr.