Disposed

Pramod Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Cooperative, Lko. and Others

Allahabad HC1 May 2024WRIA/3301/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to be treated as a Government servant and paid arrears of salary. The bench permitted the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent for future consideration without deciding the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to submit a representation to be decided within a fixed time frame; no immediate relief on merits granted.

Pramod Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P. Thru. Its… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:38702

¶2

Court No. - 6

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3301 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Cooperative, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Daya Shankar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.

¶7

With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided.

¶8

This Court has also perused the supplementary affidavit dated 06.05.2024 filed by the petitioner.

¶9

Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to treat the petitioner as a Government servant in the light of the judgment and orders dated 20.03.2001, 10.01.2017 & 26.04.2018 passed by the Apex Court and to pay salary for the months of April & May, 2023 along with gratuity to the petitioner.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection.

¶11

In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation.

¶12

With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.

¶13

It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.

¶14

Order Date :- 22.5.2024 Pachhere/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Pramod Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Cooperative, Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Cooperative, Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sant Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Lko. and 3 Others

Krishna Nand Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Shyam Mohan Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Administration Deptt., Lko. and Another

Indrajeet Singh PNO.152731063 and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy., Home Affairs Lko. and Others

Keshavram vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin.Secy. Minor Irrigation, Lko. and Others

Saurabh Singh @ Saurabh Kumar Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another