The Supreme Court of India vide order dated 18.9.2024 observed that the petitioner did not wish to press the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
Petition dismissed not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:64111
Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30151 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ram Narayan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Prasad Mishra,Abhinav Mishra,Amar Deep Mishra,Anubhav Dwivedi,Chunnu Lal,Lavlesh Giri,Mukesh Kumar Sharma,Pradeep Tiwari,Ram Pheran Dwivedi,Shrawan Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Shrawan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Diwakar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition at this stage and the same be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 18.9.2024 Om
Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Narayan
State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home And Ors.
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
