Disposed

Shiv Narayan Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Health and Family Welfare Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC18 Sept 2024/7993/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a dismissal at admission where the petitioner seeks transfer and a fresh consideration of a pending representation. The Court disposed of the petition without deciding merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to submit a fresh representation concerning his transfer and the previous order within 10 days.

Shiv Narayan Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:64151

¶2

Court No. - 4

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7993 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Shiv Narayan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Health And Family Welfare Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶6

Heard Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Deepshikha, learned C.S.C.-II for the State-respondents.

¶7

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-

¶8

" i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to transfer the petitioner from District Aligarh to District Mathura in view of Clause 5(v) of transfer policy dated 11.6.2024 expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court."

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the pending representation of the petitioner has not been decided, therefore, the petitioner may be given liberty to prefer a fresh representation to the competent authority and a direction may be issued to consider and dispose of the same with expedition.

¶10

Learned C.S.C.-II has no objection, if a direction for disposal of the representation is issued.

¶11

Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., Director General, Medical & Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, U.P., Lucknow ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier

¶12

representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 10 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law and also in view of transfer policy after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith.

¶13

Order Date :- 18.9.2024 Shravan

¶14

[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Shiv Narayan Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Health and Family Welfare Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Narayan Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Health and Family Welfare Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijay Pal vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj Lko and 2 Others

Keshav Lal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Raj Narayan Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Vijendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Forest Lko. and 2 Others

Meva Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Forest Lko. and 2 Others

Harikesh Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Namami Gange and Rural Water Supply Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others