Uma Shanker Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Heard Sri Raj Deep Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Sri S.N. Singh Gaharwar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Saharsh Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records.

¶10

By means of the instant writ petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the parties to pay arrears of pay/pension from the date of revision of pay scale.

¶11

Although, the petitioner claims to have submitted a representation dated 07.09.2023 to the opposite party no.3 for this prayer and he claims that no decision has been taken on his representation, there is nothing on record which may establish that the representation has in fact been served upon the opposite party no.3.

¶12

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation for redressal of his grievances to the opposite party no.3/Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Organization,

¶13

Police Headquarter Building, Lucknow within a period of one week. In case any such representation is submitted by the petitioner, the opposite party no.3 shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period of four weeks thereafter in accordance with law and shall communicate the order to the petitioner.

¶14

(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)

¶15

Order Date :- 5.4.2024 Ram.

¶16

Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Uma Shanker Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uma Shanker Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Bindu Singh Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

M/S Indra Pal Singh Contractor Thru. Its Prop. Indra Pal Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Chief Commissioner,State Goods and Service Tax,Lko. and 2 Others

Ajay Kumar Yadav and 11 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin.Secy. Home and 6 Others

Ram Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.

Dr. Sheo Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Animal Husbandry Lko. and Others

Uma Shanker Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others