The petitioners argued that the writ petition had become infructuous due to the lapse of time. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:1375
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2342 of 2012
Petitioner :- Sri Dharmeshwar Singh Srivstava And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Med. Health And Family Welf.Andors Counsel for Petitioner :- R.S. Dwivedi,Km. Neelam Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time the present writ petition has become infructuous and prays that the same may be dismissed as such.
As prayed, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.1.2024 S. Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sri Dharmeshwar Singh Srivstava And Others
State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Med. Health And Family Welf.Andors
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
