Petitioner's writ petition dismissed by default for non-appearance despite prior card notices, noting the case was old and not to be adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:30336
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2007482 of 1992
Petitioner :- Mahak Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secretary Rural Development And 17 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- S.P.Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Case called out.
No one has appeared on behalf of petitioner.
It appears that card notices were issued on 04.10.2023 as well as on 03.01.2024 for engaging another counsel since the earlier counsel has expired. Thirty days' time has since elapsed and therefore in terms of High Court Rules, notice is deemed sufficient upon petitioner. The matter is old and and has been listed on that heading that it shall not be adjourned.
In view of aforesaid, the petition is dismissed in default of appearance.
Order Date :- 18.4.2024 Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mahak Singh
State Of U.P. Through Secretary Rural Development And 17 Ors
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
