Disposed

Dr. Kiran Singh v. State of U.P Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. Medical Health Family Welfare Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC7 Mar 2024WRIA/1833/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the respondent to decide on the petitioner's request for retrospective sanction of leave and corresponding salary for the period 1999 to 2006 within six weeks without adjudicating the merits of the case, and disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 2 to take a decision on the petitioner's request for sanction of leave and salary by the designated authority within six weeks.

Dr. Kiran Singh vs State of U.P Thru… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:20895

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1833 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Dr. Kiran Singh

¶5

Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. Medical Health Family Welfare Civil Secrt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Verma,Pankaj Kumar Dixit

¶6

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶7

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State Counsel.

¶9

The present writ petition has been preferred for issuing direction to the respondent no. 2 Director General, Medical Health and Family Welfare to take decision on the letter dated 19.10.2022 written by the respondent no. 2 for the purposes of grant of sanction of leave in reference to the representations of the petitioner dated 14.01.2022 and 17.10.2022, within a stipulated time frame as this Court may deem fit.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the sanction of leave of the petitioner forwarded by the C.M.O to the respondent no. 2 related to the medical leaves taken by the petitioner during the period since 27.09.1999 to 29.12.2006. Once the same has been sanctioned by the respondent no. 2, the petitioner will get the salary of the days/period on which the petitioner was on medical leave during 27.09.1999 to 29.12.2006.

¶11

Learned State Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner.

¶12

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, the respondent no. 2 is directed to take a decision in the matter of the petitioner as forwarded by respondent no. 4 vide its letter dated 19.10.2022, in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date certified copy of this order is served.

¶13

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 7.3.2024 DiVYa

¶15

Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Dr. Kiran Singh v. State of U.P Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. Medical Health Family Welfare Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Kiran Singh v. State of U.P Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. Medical Health Family Welfare Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Mamta Gautam Vs Principal Secy.Governor Sectt. Lucknow and Ors.

Phoolmati Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Child Development and Nutrition Lko. and 3 Others

Smt. Saiyada Khatoon Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical/Health Lko. and 4 Others

Lallan Bharti Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Mahendra Kumar Tripathi Pno.No. 902590207 Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and 4 Others

Km. Ruchi Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Civil Secrt. Lko. and 4 Others