Petitioner sought interest on gratuity of her deceased husband, paid a decade late. Court disposed of the writ with liberty to file a fresh representation before the District Basic Education Officer for decision within six weeks in light of Janki Devi directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:6546
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 173 of 2024
Petitioner :- Madhuri Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushilendra Kumar Sahu Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shailendra Singh Rajawat
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Order Date :- 23.1.2024 Subodh/-
Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on gratuity paid ten years after her husband's death under Section 7(3A) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Janki Devi versus State of U.P. and othersRelied on¶5
Writ-A No. 7932 of 2023
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madhuri Devi
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko.
District Basic Education Officer District Amethi
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
