Disposed

Rama Shankar Nisad v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC15 Feb 2024WRIA/1088/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought directions to the Divisional Forest Officer to decide a representation for minimum pay-scale adjustment as per 7th Pay Commission. The Court, upon request and without dwelling on merits, directed the respondent to decide the matter within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation of 26.12.2023 within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Rama Shankar Nisad vs State of U.P. Thru… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:13331

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1088 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Rama Shankar Nisad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

¶7

Present writ petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the respondent no. 2-Divisional Forest Officer/Deputy Director, Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, Pallia Headquarter Lakhimpur Kheri to forthwith grant the minimum of the pay-scale of Rs. 18,000/- as per 7th Pay Commission alongwith arrears since March, 2018 in terms of the judgment and order dated 17.11.2018 passed by this Court in Writ A No. 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and Another Vs. State of U.P. and others).

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of ClassIV post in January, 2009 and he has continuously been functioning on the said post. After coming of 7th Pay Commission, the petitioner has made representation dated 26.12.2023 before respondent no. 2 for grant of minimum of pay scale of Rs. 18000/- as per 7th Pay Commission but no decision has been taken by the respondent no. 2 and the matter is still pending.

¶9

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extent that respondent no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner mentioned hereinabove within the time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.

¶10

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2023 in accordance with law and keeping in

¶12

view the judgment and order dated 17.11.2018 passed by this Court in the case of Mohan Swaroop (supra) within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶13

Order Date :- 15.2.2024 Ashish

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rama Shankar Nisad v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rama Shankar Nisad v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Women Constable Civil Police Personnel No. 204072490 Anjali Sharma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and 4 Others

Bal Krishna Dixit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Pashudhan, Lko. and 5 Others

Sindhu Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. of U.P. Lucknow and 5 Others

Rameshwar Prasad Patel Meth and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. P.W.D. and Others

Abdul Razzaq Vs State of U.P. through Principal Secy. Revenue Lucknow

Narendra Nath Agrawal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj, Civil Secrt. Lko. and 4 Others