The court disposed of a writ petition seeking directions for the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation regarding pay-scale revision under the 7th Pay Commission within two months, referencing a prior judgment.
Direction to respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's representation within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:13331
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1088 of 2024
Petitioner :- Rama Shankar Nisad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
view the judgment and order dated 17.11.2018 passed by this Court in the case of Mohan Swaroop (supra) within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 15.2.2024 Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation for grant of pay revision within a specific time limit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mohan Swaroop and Another Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶7
Writ A No. 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and Another Vs. State of U.P. and others)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rama Shankar Nisad
Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko
State Of U.P.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
