Jay Ram Pandey v. State of Up and 9 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A public interest litigation petition before the Allahabad High Court was adjourned at the counsel's request and listed for fresh listing on 2.8.2024. No substantive matter was decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 490 of 2024
Petitioner :- Jay Ram Pandey Respondent :- State Of Up And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Chandra Pathak,Yogesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Counsel for the petitioner prays for adjournment.
- List as fresh on 2.8.2024.
(Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 18.7.2024 Jaideep/-
Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jay Ram Pandey
- respondent
State Of Up And 9 Others
Coram
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/490/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Arun Bhansali Vikas Budhwar
- Order 2 · Arun Bhansali Vikas Budhwar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court