This PIL petition was disposed of observing that if the order under Section 67(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, was not challenged, the concerned authorities must proceed to implement orders for encroachment removal.
Observation that if the order is not under challenge, authorities will proceed to implement orders for removal of encroachment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:191047
Court No. - 49
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 171 of 2024
Petitioner :- Lokesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of Up And 16 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tribhuwan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hari Narayan Singh,Sanjai Kumar
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 5.12.2024 N. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of given the status of proceedings under Section 67(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lokesh Kumar
State Of Up
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
