Indrajeet Yadav v. State of Up and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A public interest litigation listed for hearing was adjourned because advocates were abstaining from work; the court ordered it to be relisted as fresh after two weeks.
A public interest litigation listed for hearing was adjourned because advocates were abstaining from work; the court ordered it to be relisted as fresh after two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 50
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1116 of 2024
Petitioner :- Indrajeet Yadav Respondent :- State Of Up And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pavan Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
Today, Advocates are abstaining from work.
In the interest of justice, list this case, as fresh, after two weeks.
Order Date :- 11.7.2024 Deepak/
Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Indrajeet Yadav
State Of Up
7 Others
Ashutosh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court