Husband sought transfer of wife's Section 125 CrPC maintenance case from Saharanpur to Budaun citing his chronic neurological illness. The court held the grounds unsubstantiated, noted the wife's convenience in matrimonial disputes, found no good ground for interference and rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:140058
Court No. - 86
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 415 of 2024
Applicant :- Sameer Rastogi Opposite Party :- Smt. Minakshi Rastogi Counsel for Applicant :- Shahnawaz Akhtar
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
others Vs. State of Haryana and another, 1999 (9) SCC 67 has held that in absence of any justified reason, it is not proper and legal to exercise power under Section 407 Cr.P.C.
Order Date :- 30.8.2024 Fhd
Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the husband's transfer application under Section 407 CrPC to shift a Section 125 CrPC maintenance case from Saharanpur Family Court to Budaun on grounds of his neurological illness deserved al
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vijay Pal and others Vs. State of Haryana and anotherRelied on¶7
1999 (9) SCC 67 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sameer Rastogi
Smt. Minakshi Rastogi
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
