Applicants sought transfer of a sessions trial from Meerut to another district, alleging threats by relatives of the deceased who are advocates and interference with counsel. The trial court reported judgment was due for pronouncement only. The High Court found no cogent ground for transfer and rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:121964
Court No. - 86
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 128 of 2024
Applicant :- Haji Ijalal And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gauri Dubey,Gautam Dubey,Jai Prakash
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Amitrana,G.A.,Vikas Sharma
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
session trial from the current trial court to any other district. The transfer application has no force and the prayer made therein is liable to be refused.
Order Date :- 30.7.2024 Rmk.
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a pending sessions trial in Meerut should be transferred to another district on allegations that the accused could not obtain a fair trial there.
8 provisions across 1 enactments
Haji Ijalal And 8 Others
State of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
