Sunil Srivastava v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, in a procedural order, granted two weeks for file objection on delay condonation and listed the matter for further hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 386 of 2024
Appellant :- Sunil Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Ajay Tripathi,Akhil Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shri Ram Pandey
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
- Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is accorded two weeks' time to file an objection on the delay condonation application. Appellant shall have a week thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit.
- Put up this matter again on 12.08.2024 in top ten cases of the cause list.
Order Date :- 19.7.2024 NLY
Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sunil Srivastava
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
3 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- SPLAD/386/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court