Revision under Section 25 Provincial Small Causes Courts Act challenging rejection of applications under Order XXII Rule 10 and Order IX Rule 7 CPC. Revision admitted with notice; further proceedings of the underlying SCC suit stayed as an interim measure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 16 of 2024
Revisionist :- M/S Jagat Theatre, Thru. Vikas Theatre And Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd., Thru. Director Aditya Khanna Opposite Party :- Shyam Kumari Bhargava And 17 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ankit Srivastava
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.]
Order Date :- 27.9.2024 KR
Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an assignee of suit property can be impleaded to defend a suit under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC despite dismissal of its application for want of prosecution.
Whether an application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC can be filed at any stage before final disposal.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
M/S Jagat Theatre, Thru. Vikas Theatre And Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd., Thru. Director Aditya Khanna
Shyam Kumari Bhargava
17 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
