Brief order regarding sufficiency of notice service and listing of a second appeal to enable correction of respondent addresses.
Case listed after two weeks to correct addresses of respondents 8 and 9.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 61 of 2024
Appellant :- Ram Khelavan And Others Respondent :- Amar Singh And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Vivek Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- Sanjay Kumar Verma
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
As per office report the service of notice on the respondent nos.2, 10, 11, 12, 16 and 18 is sufficient.
The service of notice on the respondent nos.1, 4, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15 and 17 is deemed sufficient.
The service of notice on the respondent no.8 is not sufficient as reportedly he lives in Lucknow.
The service of notice on the respondent no.9 is not sufficient as it has been informed that no one of the said name resides on the given address.
As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant, list after two weeks to enable him to provide/ amend the correct address of the respondent nos.8 and 9.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.)
Order Date :- 15.10.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Khelavan
Amar Singh
Rajnish Kumar
Haseenuddin
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
