Second appeal of 1983 dismissed for non-prosecution despite counsel's prayer for adjournment, as the court had earlier clarified no further adjournment would be granted; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 732 of 1983
Appellant :- Sunder Lal And Another Respondent :- Bankey Lal And Another Counsel for Appellant :- H.S.Sahai,S.Mirza,Satendra Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Mohd.Ilyas,Awadhesh Kumar
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Satendra Nath Rai, learned counsel for the appellants prays for adjournment for the day, whereas while passing the order dated 24.05.2024, it was clarified that the case shall not be adjourned on the next date.
In view of above, this appeal, of the year 1983, can not be adjourned.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 29.7.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sunder Lal
Bankey Lal
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
