List being revised. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was not present and made no request to adjourn or pass over the case.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 709 of 1988
Appellant :- Hari Sharan Respondent :- Farid Ahamad And Others Counsel for Appellant :- M.R.Misra,Abhishek Mishra,Dr. L.P. Mishra,K.L. Vishwakarma,Lalta Prasad Misra,Udai Bhan Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- Fareed Ahmad,M.E.Khan,Mohd Sakeel,Siptain Haider
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None is present for the appellant to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 27.9.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Hari Sharan
Farid Ahamad And Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
