The second appeal was called in court. The appellant's counsel stated there was no instruction available. Consequently, the appellate court dismissed the appeal for want of instruction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:81051
Court No. - 17
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 299 of 2004
Appellant :- Shiv Mangal And 2 Ors. Respondent :- Shitla Prasad And 2 Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Sulabh Kr. Srivstava Counsel for Respondent :- Krishna Kuamr Singh
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case has been called.
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that despite repeated efforts, he has no instruction in the matter, therefore, the same may be dismissed as such.
In view of above, the second appeal is dismissed for want of instruction.
Order Date :- 5.12.2024 S. Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shiv Mangal And 2 Ors.
Shitla Prasad And 2 Ors.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
