The High Court dismissed the second appeal for want of prosecution as none of the appellant's counsel was present to press the matter or request an adjournment. No substantive relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 245 of 2011
Appellant :- Govind Prasad Khandelwal S/O Late Satya Naraian Khandelwal Respondent :- Sandeep Kumar S/O Mata Badal Singh And 4 Others S Counsel for Appellant :- Shrawan Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Ravi Shanker Somvanshi,Sunil Sharma
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None is present on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
The appeal is of the year 2011.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 15.10.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Govind Prasad Khandelwal
Sandeep Kumar And 4 Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
