Mizad v. Siddiq
Case brief
What is this about?
Case heard by Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar, J. on Second Appeal No. 182 of 1987. Counsel sought adjournment without reason. Court dismissed appeal for non-prosecution, allowing appellant to abandon the matter.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 182 of 1987
Appellant :- Mizad Respondent :- Siddiq Counsel for Appellant :- S. Mirza,Abdul Rasid,Akhlaq Ali,Syed Ahmad Jamal
Counsel for Respondent :- R.P. Singh
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Sri Tanveer Ahmad,Advocate holding brief of Sri Syed Ahmad Jamal, learned counsel for the appellant prays for adjournment without disclosing any reason and despite repeated asking, he failed to disclose any reason for getting the case adjourned.
Order sheet indicates that the case was being got adjourned by learned counsel for the appellant on the previous dates also.
The appeal is of the year 1987.
In view of above, it appears that the appellant does not want to pursue the matter.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mizad
- respondent
Siddiq
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/182/1987
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Manjeet Singh vs Mr. Ashutosh Mohan Agnihotri, Addl. Dir. Rajya Krishi Utapadan Mandi Parishad, U.P. Lko.and Another
Ram Janak and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others
Ishanavi Singh Thru. Biological Father Amit Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others
Ram and Ors. Vs Saflu and Ros